Vue d'ensemble
-
Date de création 7 octobre 2005
-
Secteurs Comptabilité / Finance
-
Offres de stage et d'emploi 0
-
Nombre d'employés 1-5
Description de l'entreprise
Generative Artificial Intelligence
Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially big language models (LLMs), enabled an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image synthetic intelligence image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu in addition to various smaller firms have established generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]
Generative AI has uses throughout a wide variety of industries, consisting of software application development, healthcare, finance, entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] style, [18] and item style. [19] However, concerns have been raised about the possible abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, making use of fake news or deepfakes to deceive or control individuals, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Copyright law issues also exist around generative models that are trained on and imitate copyrighted artworks. [22]
Early history
Since its inception, scientists in the field have actually raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the effects of creating artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these problems have previously been explored by misconception, fiction and approach since antiquity. [23] The idea of automated art go back a minimum of to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where inventors such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having actually designed makers capable of composing text, creating sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of imaginative automations has actually flourished throughout history, exhibited by Maillardet’s robot created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been utilized to model natural languages since their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his very first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the novel Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]
Academic synthetic intelligence
The scholastic discipline of expert system was established at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced a number of waves of development and optimism in the decades considering that. [31] Expert system research study started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and researchers have used synthetic intelligence to develop artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and exhibiting generative AI works developed by AARON, the computer system program Cohen produced to produce paintings. [32]
The terms generative AI planning or generative planning were used in the 1980s and 1990s to describe AI planning systems, especially computer-aided process planning, used to produce sequences of actions to reach a specified objective. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI techniques such as state space search and restriction complete satisfaction and were a “reasonably fully grown” innovation by the early 1990s. They were used to create crisis action prepare for military usage, [35] process prepare for producing [33] and choice strategies such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]
Generative neural webs (2014-2019)
Since its beginning, the field of device knowing used both discriminative designs and generative designs, to design and predict data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the development of deep knowing drove development and research study in image classification, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this age were typically trained as discriminative models, due to the difficulty of generative modeling. [37]
In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks efficient in finding out generative designs, instead of discriminative ones, for intricate information such as images. These deep generative models were the first to output not only class labels for images however likewise whole images.
In 2017, the Transformer network enabled advancements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] leading to the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize not being watched to various tasks as a Foundation model. [40]
The new generative models presented during this duration allowed for large neural networks to be trained utilizing not being watched knowing or semi-supervised learning, instead of the supervised learning common of discriminative models. Unsupervised knowing got rid of the need for humans to by hand identify data, permitting larger networks to be trained. [41]
Generative AI boom (2020-)
In March 2020, 15. ai, created by a confidential MIT scientist, was a complimentary web application that might produce persuading character voices using very little training data. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, affecting subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]
In 2021, the development of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to high-quality expert system art development from natural language prompts. [46] These systems showed extraordinary capabilities in generating photorealistic images, artwork, and develops based upon text descriptions, resulting in widespread adoption among artists, designers, and the general public.
In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT transformed the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s capability to take part in natural conversations, create innovative content, help with coding, and perform different analytical tasks recorded worldwide attention and stimulated prevalent conversation about AI’s potential effect on work, education, and imagination. [48]
In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI capabilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still insufficient) version of a synthetic basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was contested by other scholars who preserved that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the standard of ‘general human intelligence'” since 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model combining several techniques including text, images, video, thermal information, 3D information, audio, and movement, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]
In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI model available in four variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed prepare for “Bard Advanced” powered by the bigger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google merged Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, introducing a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]
In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 household of big language models, consisting of Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models showed significant improvements in abilities across different standards, with Claude 3 Opus notably outperforming leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated enhanced performance compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, especially in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]
According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually become a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents using the technology, exceeding both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is additional evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report exposing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, considerably surpassing the United States in patent applications. [58]
Modalities
A generative AI system is constructed by applying unsupervised device learning (invoking for circumstances neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised device finding out trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend upon the technique or type of the data set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For example, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]
Text
Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language designs). They can natural language processing, machine translation, and natural language generation and can be used as foundation designs for other jobs. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).
Code
In addition to natural language text, large language models can be trained on shows language text, permitting them to generate source code for brand-new computer system programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]
Images
Producing high-quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are frequently used for text-to-image generation and neural design transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).
Audio
Generative AI can also be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech capabilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which demonstrated the capability to clone character voices using as little as 15 seconds of training information. [67] The site gained prevalent attention for its capability to produce mentally meaningful speech for numerous imaginary characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options subsequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]
Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music along with text annotations, in order to produce new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a soothing violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.
Music
Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been generated, like the song Savages, which utilized AI to imitate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising a debate about whether artists ought to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]
Many AI music generators have been created that can be produced using a text expression, genre choices, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]
Video
Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video clips. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]
Actions
Generative AI can likewise be trained on the movements of a robotic system to produce brand-new trajectories for motion planning or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research utilizes triggers like “get blue bowl” or “clean plate with yellow sponge” to manage movements of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out fundamental thinking in action to user triggers and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when given the timely choice up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]
3D modeling
Artificially smart computer-aided design (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might likewise be established using linked open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to help streamline workflow. [82]
Software and hardware
Generative AI designs are used to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, shows tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have actually been incorporated into a variety of existing commercially readily available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are also available as open-source software application, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.
Smaller generative AI designs with as much as a couple of billion criteria can run on smartphones, embedded devices, and desktop computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion specifications) can operate on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can work on an iPhone 11. [90]
Larger models with 10s of billions of parameters can operate on laptop or home computer. To achieve an appropriate speed, designs of this size might need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon products. For example, the 65 billion parameter version of LLaMA can be set up to operate on a desktop PC. [91]
The benefits of running generative AI in your area include defense of privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular concentrates on using consumer-grade video gaming graphics cards [92] through such methods as compression. That forum is among only 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design standards. [93] Yann LeCun has promoted open-source designs for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI security. [95]
Language models with numerous billions of parameters, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, typically run on datacenter computers equipped with arrays of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large designs are typically accessed as cloud services online.
In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed restrictions on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to satisfy the requirements of the sanctions.
There is free software application on the marketplace capable of acknowledging text produced by generative synthetic intelligence (such as GPTZero), as well as images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for finding generative AI material include digital watermarking, material authentication, details retrieval, and maker learning classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both totally free and paid AI text detectors have often produced false positives, mistakenly accusing students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]
Law and guideline
In the United States, a group of companies including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary arrangement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to need all US business to report information to the federal government when training specific high-impact AI models. [104] [105]
In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act consists of requirements to divulge copyrighted material used to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]
In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China manages any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark created images or videos, policies on training information and label quality, limitations on individual information collection, and a guideline that generative AI must “abide by socialist core worths”. [108] [109]
Copyright
Training with copyrighted material
Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, openly available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI designers have argued that such training is secured under reasonable use, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]
Proponents of reasonable usage training have argued that it is a transformative usage and does not involve making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the general public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs take on the content they are trained on. [112]
Since 2024, numerous claims associated with making use of copyrighted product in training are continuous. Getty Images has actually sued Stability AI over using its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have actually taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]
Copyright of AI-generated material
A different question is whether AI-generated works can receive copyright defense. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works developed by expert system without any human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has actually also begun taking public input to determine if these rules require to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]
Concerns
The development of generative AI has actually raised concerns from federal governments, organizations, and individuals, leading to demonstrations, legal actions, calls to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by several governments. In a July 2023 rundown of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres stated “Generative AI has massive potential for great and wicked at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge international development” and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, but that its malicious use “might trigger horrific levels of death and destruction, prevalent trauma, and deep mental damage on an unimaginable scale”. [118]
Job losses
From the early days of the development of AI, there have actually been arguments advanced by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computers in fact should be done by them, provided the difference in between computers and human beings, and between quantitative calculations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually led to 70% of the tasks for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor disagreements. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “expert system postures an existential threat to creative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has actually been seen as a potential difficulty to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]
The crossway of AI and employment concerns amongst underrepresented groups globally stays a vital aspect. While AI promises effectiveness enhancements and ability acquisition, concerns about job displacement and biased recruiting procedures continue among these groups, as outlined in surveys by Fast Company. To utilize AI for a more fair society, proactive steps incorporate mitigating predispositions, promoting transparency, respecting personal privacy and approval, and accepting diverse teams and ethical considerations. Strategies include redirecting policy focus on guideline, inclusive style, and education’s capacity for personalized teaching to optimize benefits while reducing harms. [126]
Racial and gender bias
Generative AI models can reflect and magnify any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For instance, a language design might presume that doctors and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases are typical in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image model triggered with the text “a picture of a CEO” may disproportionately create images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased data set. A number of techniques for alleviating bias have actually been tried, such as modifying input prompts [129] and reweighting training information. [130]
Deepfakes
Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep learning” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and change them with another person’s similarity utilizing artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have gathered widespread attention and issues for their uses in deepfake star adult videos, revenge porn, phony news, scams, health disinformation, monetary fraud, and concealed foreign election disturbance. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited actions from both industry and federal government to find and limit their usage. [140] [141]
In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically discovered that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim ladies supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]
In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (distributed ledger technology) to promote “openness, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and usage”. [144]
Audio deepfakes
Instances of users abusing software application to produce questionable statements in the singing design of stars, public officials, and other well-known people have raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In response, business such as ElevenLabs have actually stated that they would deal with mitigating prospective abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]
Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The same software application utilized to clone voices has been utilized on famous artists’ voices to develop tunes that mimic their voices, gaining both incredible popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have actually likewise been used to create better quality or full-length variations of songs that have actually been leaked or have yet to be launched. [155]
Generative AI has actually also been utilized to create brand-new digital artist personalities, with some of these receiving sufficient attention to get record offers at major labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have likewise faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of reaction for “dehumanizing” an artform, and also creating artists which create unrealistic or unethical appeals to their audiences. [157]
Cybercrime
Generative AI’s ability to create sensible fake material has been made use of in numerous types of cybercrime, including phishing frauds. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been used to develop disinformation and scams. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos end up being perfectly practical, they would stop appearing impressive to viewers, possibly causing uncritical approval of incorrect information. [159] Additionally, large language designs and other forms of text-generation AI have actually been utilized to create phony evaluations of e-commerce websites to increase scores. [160] Cybercriminals have created big language designs concentrated on scams, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]
A 2023 research study showed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, enabling assaulters to get assist with hazardous requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their security restrictions at low expense. [163]
Reliance on market giants
Training frontier AI designs requires an enormous quantity of computing power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the funds to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]
Energy and environment
Scientists and journalists have actually revealed concerns about the environmental impact that the development and deployment of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large quantities of freshwater used for information centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electricity usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise issue that these effects may increase as these designs are integrated into commonly used search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as models need to be re-trained. [170]
Proposed mitigation methods include factoring prospective ecological costs prior to design advancement or data collection, [165] increasing efficiency of information centers to decrease electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] constructing more efficient machine learning designs, [168] [166] [169] decreasing the variety of times that designs need to be retrained, [167] establishing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological effect of these models, [168] [167] regulating for transparency of these designs, [167] controling their energy and water use, [168] encouraging researchers to publish data on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject matter professionals who comprehend both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]
Content quality
The New york city Times defines slop as analogous to spam: “inferior or undesirable A.I. material in social networks, art, books and … in search outcomes.” [172] Journalists have actually expressed issues about the scale of low-quality created material with regard to social networks material small amounts, [173] the monetary incentives from social networks companies to spread out such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research study paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to find higher quality or preferred material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated content by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]
A paper released by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of websites, were machine translated. Much of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, specifically for sentences that were equated throughout a minimum of three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated across more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]
In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that computed word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had stopped updating the information for several reasons: high expenses for acquiring data from Reddit and Twitter, extreme focus on generative AI compared to other techniques in the natural language processing neighborhood, which “generative AI has polluted the data”. [181]
The adoption of generative AI tools caused a surge of AI-generated material across several domains. A study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM help. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of freshly published computer technology documents and 16.9% of peer evaluation text now include content produced by LLMs. [183]
Visual material follows a similar pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that an average of 34 million images have been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had actually been generated utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by designs based on Stable Diffusion. [184]
If AI-generated content is consisted of in new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI models, problems in the resulting models may take place. [185] Training an AI model exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this procedure, where each new model is trained on the previous design’s output, causes progressive deterioration and ultimately results in a “model collapse” after numerous versions. [186] Tests have actually been carried out with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the value of information collected from genuine human interactions with systems may become increasingly valuable in the presence of LLM-generated material in data crawled from the Internet.
On the other side, synthetic data is typically used as an option to information produced by real-world events. Such data can be deployed to confirm mathematical designs and to train maker knowing models while maintaining user personal privacy, [188] consisting of for structured data. [189] The method is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been utilized to train computer vision models. [190]
Misuse in journalism
In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been using an undisclosed internal AI tool to write at least 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]
In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a fake AI-generated interview with previous racing motorist Michael Schumacher, who had actually not made any public looks considering that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing mishap. The story included 2 possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “stealthily real”, and the interview included a recommendation at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter in the middle of the controversy. [192]
Other outlets that have released posts whose content and/or byline have been validated or believed to be created by generative AI designs – frequently with false material, mistakes, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – consist of:
– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]
In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had utilized generative AI to produce articles for many of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had produced 10s of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]
News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually presented news with anchors based upon Generative AI designs, triggering concerns about task losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has historically been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content creators or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically generated anchors have actually also been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]
In 2023, Google supposedly pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce news stories” based upon input data offered, such as “details of existing events”. Some news business executives who viewed the pitch described it as” [taking] for approved the effort that entered into producing accurate and artful newspaper article.” [224]
In February 2024, Google released a program to pay little publishers to write 3 articles per day utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not need the knowledge or consent of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it need the published short articles to be identified as being produced or assisted by these models. [225]
Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have undergone cybersquatting, with short articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]
United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually revealed issue that generative AI might have a hazardous impact on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for explore generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI business creating a reliance for these news outlets. [235]
Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which sums up newspaper article, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially further decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]
In action to potential risks around the use and misuse of generative AI in journalism and stress over decreasing audience trust, outlets all over the world, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have released standards around how they plan to utilize and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]
In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are unpleasant with news produced by “mainly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “mainly human with some assistance from AI”. The results of international surveys reported that people were more unpleasant with news subjects including politics (46%), criminal offense (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]
Computer programs website
Technology portal
Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with extensive capabilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Field of study
Chatbot – Program that replicates conversation
Computational imagination – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of large language design
Large language model – Type of maker learning model
Music and artificial intelligence – Usage of synthetic intelligence to generate music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is produced algorithmically rather than manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of info retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term used in maker learning
References
^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, services, and federal governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, retrieved January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced tasks apocalypse right now”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ fight versus AI, people win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation refilled? Fears about the effect of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems clash with copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, retrieved October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Expert System. New York, New York: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Brief History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer assisted procedure preparation: the cutting edge study”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a traditional generative AI coordinator based upon the HSTS preparation framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control element is a traditional spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural part explicitly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Thorough Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are without supervision multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language understanding with not being watched learning”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some form given that ’15. ai’ launched in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E develops possible images of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace human beings?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI model that integrates 6 kinds of data”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google introduces Gemini-an effective AI model it says can exceed GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, going beyond GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a fast new AI design – and a clever brand-new method to connect with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Be Alive.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and dangers of structure designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Investing in Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that just English voices are available.; Another significant function of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June stated that it utilized 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, which included 10,000 “high-quality” certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s scientists laid out in a paper the ethical challenges that they encountered around the advancement of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer stimulates debate over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the initial on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD model develop times with new AI-driven part production method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more safe and secure by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as start-up Runway announces brand-new design”. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is fundamental. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system innovations such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of company software application … the new A.I. functions, dubbed Copilot, will be available in some of the business’s most popular business apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories function just got a big upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll be able to use generative AI to come up with some suggested names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will end up being one of the most essential features for innovative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday unveiled a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to access and use Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you desire to run LLaMA 2 on your own machine or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can produce a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are created in your area, so you don’t need an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in your home, you will require a computer system build with a powerful GPU that can handle the large quantity of data and computation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust 2 LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. officials order Nvidia to stop sales of top AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to stringent U.S. export requirements that restrict just how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 totally free software to identify fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We checked a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI might be impossible. That’s a huge issue for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI material for security, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first regulation on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU legislators choose tougher AI guidelines as draft relocate to final phase”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI rules to use just to items for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New york city Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise accepting the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Beginning”. Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what individuals think about AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Taking a Stand on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking computer game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art market apparently decimated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of sophisticated tech”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding an agreement that explicitly demands AI regulations to protect writers and the works they develop. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to change labor-has become an essential sticking point for actors going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more typically understood as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘artificial intelligence postures an existential hazard to innovative professions, and all stars and entertainers deserve contract language that safeguards them from having their identity and skill made use of without approval and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries worldwide are stressed about AI being a risk to jobs”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are biased. Can reasoning assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and improving safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 illustrated the difficulties of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying modern pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the increase”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech could start a worldwide showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to enhance anti-U.S. impact projects, officials say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the obstacles of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of expert system and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has actually begun”. Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at danger from AI-driven disinformation, say experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to create celeb hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake star audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that simulate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ predicts the biggest threat is that deepfakes will ultimately end up being uninteresting”. Business Insider. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we checked out online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most effective AI designs open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it suggests for climate modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of synthetic intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring – and primarily secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system scientist explains the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design unexpectedly tries to customize its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The latest wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the internet and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was manageable and often recognizable. Large language models produce text that masquerades as real language with intent behind it, even though there is none, and their output appear all over,” she composed. She provides the example that ChatGPT excessive uses the word “dive,” in such a way that individuals do not, which has shaken off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the occurrence of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI designs collapse when trained on recursively created information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Danger to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found mistakes in more than half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A magazine promoted Michael Schumacher’s very first interview in years. It was actually AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch pauses AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab a/c “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Relocate To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Pertaining to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI post about ladies’s usage of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a fixture in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What remains in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated regional news, everything – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for traditional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of regional news websites is releasing AI-written articles under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming reporter caught utilizing synthetic intelligence to create phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine releases AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are permeating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will upgrade AI feature after inaccurate news informs”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are using AI-generated speakers to check out the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor revealed in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Has The Ability To Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Precious Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are stunned to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is currently getting into Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the original on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators caution AI could result in ‘destruction’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta left news. Now the business’s using it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s approach to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A relative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 worldwide news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.